It is not quite fair to say that PhotoCD is 8-bit when a drum scan is 12-bit. PhotoCD is 8-bit log-scale when a drum scanner is 12-bit linear. PCD is more like 10-bit linear with more efficient coding.
-- Robert SIlvers, November 11, 1997
One thing I would add to flatbed resolution comments is that, while it is true that 72dpi or 300dpi is enough for most files, a scanner is not a perfect device and adds noise to each pixel. If you scan at a high (say 600x600dpi) resolution and then downsample, you average this noise out and get a cleaner file. I would NEVER scan at less than 150dpi -- even if you want 72dpi. Clean files also compress better.
-- Robert SIlvers, November 11, 1997
Most of us cannot afford the approx. $1000 scanners. We need the best available/affordable. I had to research this because my wife wasn't about to let me spend $500, much less $1000 for a scanner. I needed a good all purpose scanner to scan old family photos, slides and negatives (1890 thru 1960 vintage). I found the Epson Perfection 1200 PHOTO that has a transparency adapter, that will scan at 1200x2400 DPI opptical, which is $299 at www.scanneroutlet.com. These are the scanners that the commom folk need recommended.Phil
-- Phil Dziki, January 30, 2000
It's easy to say that we should use negatives or slides when scanning, instead of prints. Regrettably to scan a slide or negative accurately you cannot use one of the abundant $200-$300 scanners that most people buy.So I use my scanner for getting quick snaps of photographs into my system.
Now however I have a Nikon Coolpix 950 Camera. Excellent camera, 1600x1200 resolution. I use it more and more... I used to have an Minolta D'Image-V camera (expensive and with 640x480 and very limited battery life) but this was not more useful than for putting small thumbnails on a web-site or for utilitarian purposes as when we were househunting.
The Nikon, I actually use next to my regular camera. It's got lots of goodies, such as spot metering, manual control, great battery life, external flash connection, etc.
The resolution 1600x1200, whilst not as high as PCD or high-end negative scan, certainly exceeds what you would get from a flat-bed scanner with a negative or slide adapter. I have printed pictures blown up to 5"x7" on an Epson colour printer on expensive paper, and these look great. Given that 150 dpi is usually enough for a good photo-printer to do it's work, you should be able to enlarge this up to 11"x8".
-- Peter van Es, April 3, 2000